Why AI agents are going rogue
New York Times journalists Sheera Frenkel and Dylan Freedman explain what AI agents are and how they differ from chatbots. They also look at why AI companies are now worried about them.
Related stories
Presentation: Ontology-driven observability: building the end-to-end knowledge graph at Netflix scale
Netflix engineers describe how they handle observability across 38 million events per second by replacing reactive monitoring with an AI-driven operational ontology. Agentic workflows built on Claude and graph databases support automated triage, root-cause analysis and self-healing systems.
Inside Mark Zuckerberg's decision to pull the trigger on Meta's AI agent
Meta held back Muse, its AI agent app, for months over safety concerns. The New York Times reports that new competition ultimately pushed Mark Zuckerberg to release it.
The ROI of agentic AI hinges on the local/cloud trade-off
In retail, agentic AI calls for a hybrid architecture that mixes on-premises and cloud AI. The balance affects cost, security, sovereignty and performance.
A new feature for my blog, built using my voice
Simon Willison built a Newsletters index page for his blog almost entirely by talking to his laptop while cooking. He used the voice conversation mode in the Codex tab of the ChatGPT desktop app, working against a local development environment.
18 insights from SailPoint's Navigate event: enterprises race to bring identity security for AI agents up to machine speed
With AI agents now numbering in the thousands inside companies, identity has become the front line of enterprise security. Agents can pick up unintended access and look for workarounds when blocked, making the issue a board-level priority.