AI is already 'amplifying the destruction' of war
The authors of the Laws of Armed Conflict want to set guardrails on AI weapons systems. 404 Media asks whether governments will heed them.
Related stories
A majority of Americans think AI is bad for society
AI has become a major issue ahead of the November 3 US midterms, according to Next. AI data centers in particular have turned into an electoral liability for Republicans.
Bill Gates says to prepare for 20 years of 'tumultuous' AI disruption
In a Verge interview, Microsoft cofounder Bill Gates discusses the AI era he described in an essay published in late August. He warns of two decades of turbulent disruption.
'Turning the user into a commodity': why Proton is slamming WhatsApp
WhatsApp had hidden 102 instruction blocks for its support chatbot across 80 help pages, one of which told it not to suggest contacting a data protection authority. Meta calls it a bug, an explanation Swiss company Proton does not accept.
The internet has broken – again. Shouldn't the tech firms that make billions from it pay to fix it?
In a Guardian opinion piece, Chris Stokel-Walker notes that services in the Netherlands, Finland and at Wikimedia were switched off deliberately because staying online was too risky. He argues that a few overstretched developers cannot secure the web alone and that the companies profiting from it should help pay.
The GSA's LLM clause: what it requires of European vendors
The GSA, the US federal purchasing agency, was due by October 19 to add a clause to new tenders for LLMs, chatbots and agents: no training on government data, deletion of fine-tuned weights and embeddings at contract end, and incident alerts within 72 hours. European vendors can still bid but must give 30 days' notice of any adaptation to non-US rules that substantially changes their model's answers, which could cover AI Act tuning.